Thursday, 23 August 2012
Sorority Row
A film like this has to be judged by its own standards, or those
of its genre. Any attempt to compare it to cinema more widely, or art and literature
as a whole, would result in calamity. There’s no mistaking who this film was
made for and why. Five final year students at a sorority house in an anonymous
University in the US accidentally kill their friend. They decide to hide the
body, but nine months later, when they are graduating, something starts picking
them off, one by one. This may sound very, very familiar, and it is. I Know What You Did Last Summer did this
twelve years earlier. However, as I found out after watching the film, Sorority Row is a ‘reimagining’ of an
80s original: The House on Sorority Row.
So the claims of which came first are perhaps moot. Nonetheless, Sorority Row cannot be said to be
original or innovative in anything that it does. To a certain extent teen horrors
aren’t expected to do this, but the best, and most famous, always stretch the
boundaries of what’s possible within their limits. As with Lesbian Vampire Killers, it may seem relatively easy to make a film
like this. There are, as Randy from Scream
might say, certain rules that one must
abide by in order to successfully make a horror movie. Sorority Row fails on several counts. Who, for instance, is
the main character? We’re never really sure. This needs to be defined fairly
early, unless you want to constantly tease the audience with who will or won’t survive
– but this is a risky step itself. Is the killer frightening enough? Are they supernatural
or human? Do they have a certain unique style, or way of killing? It seems some
of this has been considered (the tyre iron), but not all of it. When we
discover who the killer actually is, the reason for the killer to have acted
the way they did becomes meaningless. This ‘reveal’, in fact, is one of the
hardest things to pull off in these films. Here it is done poorly (someone
spots something in someone’s conveniently open bag), although there is at least
some surprise as to who it is. The murders themselves are so obviously flagged
that they’re not at all frightening, gruesome, or even funny (as they sometimes
are in the Scream franchise). It
seems we’ve become so used to films like this, that we need them to be more and
more extreme, leading to the torture porn in Hostel and Saw, which
even I refuse to watch. The end of the film has multiple, anti-climactic
conclusions and we leave it feeling we have experienced very little style, and
virtually no substance. Even by the standards of the genre, this film is poor.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Hateful Eight
Tarantino has said he'll only make ten films, and then retire. I don't know if he still stands by this statement, and if he does we ...
-
The name may seem a bit odd, and perhaps slightly self-pitying. The reasons for it, however, are fourfold: Because I was intending at the ...
-
The third film of Quentin Tarantino is perhaps the least talked about and least appreciated. I don't remember ever seeing it at the cin...
-
Would you watch Memento in order? Perhaps you already have. Some might say the only value in the film is that of solving a complex puzzle. ...
No comments:
Post a Comment