Thursday, 29 March 2007
Thursday
It's been puzzling me as to why they have made another Mr Bean film. I had thought the first one was such a failure that it had killed off the character and any hope of a franchise. An hour and a half of a guy who doesn't talk? That's weird. Bean worked in a particular time and place, and for very short fragments. The transference to the big screen and America seemed an awful idea. Anyway, it's been done again, and apparently this time Rowan Atkinson says this is the last one. We can only hope. The review on imdb suggests a connection with 'the silent greats' Keaton and Chaplin. Well, maybe. But they were stretching their medium and its technology as far as it would go. Atkinson is limiting his. Not that that's a bad thing (see Funny Ha Ha), but silent comedy just doesn't feel right anymore. I did like the original Bean TV series, but it seems to have passed its moment. Anyway, it got me thinking about successful and unsuccessful transferences from TV to Film (or short to long). It's very hard to get right.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Hateful Eight
Tarantino has said he'll only make ten films, and then retire. I don't know if he still stands by this statement, and if he does we ...
-
The name may seem a bit odd, and perhaps slightly self-pitying. The reasons for it, however, are fourfold: Because I was intending at the ...
-
The third film of Quentin Tarantino is perhaps the least talked about and least appreciated. I don't remember ever seeing it at the cin...
-
Would you watch Memento in order? Perhaps you already have. Some might say the only value in the film is that of solving a complex puzzle. ...
No comments:
Post a Comment