Tuesday, 26 June 2007
Wednesday
My first reaction to theguardian's 1000 films to see before you die (200 issued every day this week) was 'why?'. I mean, what are we supposed to do with this list? No explanation is given. Clearly it took a lot of effort, thought, and previous knowledge to put together. Was this only so they could sell more papers, as in my case they are? The only thing they seem to vaguely advocate is going to their website to discuss the list. Do they really care about our opinions that much? That seems a rather strange outcome. Perhaps we are expected to read the whole thing and make sure we've seen all of them, literally, before we die? More probable, of course, is that it was an exercise in attracting, and keeping, readers - in building an image of themselves as an artistic, left-wing newspaper. Personally, I'm going to collect them all and keep them on a bookshelf somewhere. Then, on a day when I feel like watching a film but can't decide what, I might look through it. Their list isn't necessary, there are other ways of doing this, and it's claim to be 'unique' is annoying, but it's good enough.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Hateful Eight
Tarantino has said he'll only make ten films, and then retire. I don't know if he still stands by this statement, and if he does we ...
-
The name may seem a bit odd, and perhaps slightly self-pitying. The reasons for it, however, are fourfold: Because I was intending at the ...
-
The third film of Quentin Tarantino is perhaps the least talked about and least appreciated. I don't remember ever seeing it at the cin...
-
Would you watch Memento in order? Perhaps you already have. Some might say the only value in the film is that of solving a complex puzzle. ...
No comments:
Post a Comment