Casino Royale is a good Bond film. I was almost tempted to consider it as a film on its own, as I think its makers attempted to do at times, but they eventually, as did I, returned to rely on the conventions of the franchise and the expectations of their audience. Nonetheless, they seem to have at last acknowledged the threat to them, and the excitement for us, of films like The Bourne Identity, and made a much more modern, energetic James Bond film. As I say, it is so good as to almost stand on its own. There was much more sincerity, and a lot less humour and gimmicks, than we’ve seen with Pierce Brosnan. They stretch Bond’s vulnerability a little too much, but then appropriately reel it all back in at the end. Some people may dislike the whole idea of franchises, but then I would say that they have no understanding of cinema, and can not consider themselves ‘cinema lovers’ if they continue to maintain such a position. Franchises are cinema – the ultimate big screen, bag of popcorn, Saturday afternoon entertainment. As such, I was convinced of seeing it in the largest theatre – the Odeon Leicester Square – and don’t regret doing so, or spending so much, for a minute.
Tuesday, 21 November 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Hateful Eight
Tarantino has said he'll only make ten films, and then retire. I don't know if he still stands by this statement, and if he does we ...
-
Having seen Angelina Jolie in Pushing Tin , I decided to pursue her career further. I wondered why she was so highly regarded, except for ha...
-
Many of you have written to ask why I am boycotting Days of Glory . 'Why, Nick, why? Why are you doing this to us?' I hear you cry....
-
Renting videos has become quite difficult lately. I went in to my local store yesterday looking for a new release to watch, only to find tha...
No comments:
Post a Comment